Hellbent on Hicks
I don’t deny the teeth (which I find good evidence). As much as I want to believe that Hicks and Jones are the same person, there’s something off that I can’t quite figure out. It doesn’t even really matter to me if one could prove that they’re the same person. This seems to be a distraction more than anything, to keep us off focussing on Alex Jones’ real purpose: to discredit anyone looking into truth.
The raspy voice would be very hard to keep up hour after hour – unless he had some disruptive surgery.
tokarski is discussing. 
Terran Downvale is discussing. 
Don Wachtmeester is discussing. 
tokarski 7:13 pm on June 27, 2017 Permalink |
Yes, Hicks/Jones in retrospect seems a gimme. And I agree, it is more important to focus on Jones’ disinformation role than the trickery behind identity switching and lifetime acting. We found many, many more – Joplin/Amy Goodman, Hendrix/Cornel West, Fuller/Bill O’Reilly, DeWilde/Thom Hartmann, Pam Courson/Baba Wawa … and it seemed like a game. And, of course, few believed us … people of average curiosity are far more likely too see what they are told they see by authority figures than to question that authority with far-out findings like ours.
So what, we had to wonder, should be our goal? There is going to be no “awakening” – I have never bought in to that missionary notion. The power we are up against is deeply entrenched and in control of everything. What is the point?
And the answer is that this is a fucked up planet, for sure, but that people are good, so we have to just enjoy the search for truth for its own value. It has to satisfy on its own, because if it does not, it yields nothing but frustration.
And I am OK with that.